Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crywank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Steven Crossin 19:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Crywank[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find significant discussion of this band in multiple reliable sources. Google search brings up fewer than 100 results, mainly entries in social media, music streaming sites, and event announcements. Some blog posts. There is one article in VICE, a short notice about their new video, but I don't think that's sufficient to meet WP:GNG or WP:NBAND. ... discospinster _talk 14:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 14:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 14:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The artist was featured on Noisey/Vice as mentioned, they also have an Allmusic biography. I've added an article on the AV Club about the Simpsons referencing side project EP, as well as an article from the website of a Polish newspaper highlighting their recent gig in Poznań. Vice, The AV Club and Allmusic in particular are all considered notable. Lewishhh (talk) 15:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough notable articles now cited to meet WP:GNG or WP:NBAND Yealdgate (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as additional references to significant reliable sources coverage have been added to the article since nomination so that it now passes WP:GNG thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 21:29, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.