Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryotek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 17:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cryotek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional character that appears not to pass WP:GNG, sources are all primary, no individual notability asserted. Normally would merge to character list, but no list appears to exist. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC) Black Kite (t) (c) 22:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Major character in a major franchise. Mathewignash (talk) 02:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're kidding right? His fiction appearances have all been fan club materials! His toy was a store exclusive. THIS guy is the definition of not known to (and thus, not affecting) the world outside of TF fandom. --Khajidha (talk) 19:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't want to make this seem like wiki-stalking, I'm just looking at the Transformers AfDs at the moment. But to the article, there are only two sources, neither reliable or conferring independent notability. Searches online don't reveal anything that could either be reliable sourcing or confer notability. Skinny87 (talk) 20:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Predacons. --Divebomb (talk) 14:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect – not enough secondary sources of sufficient quality or reliability to establish independent notability of a fictional character. Lambanog (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. --Khajidha (talk) 18:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- poor "sources" and lack of assertion of notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 17:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.