Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crunchwrap Supreme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 02:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crunchwrap Supreme[edit]

Prod contested by anonymous IP without leaving a reason. Non-notable food item; being sold by a notable restaurant chain does not confer notability. No notability independent of Taco Bell and not a major enough part of Taco Bell to warrant its own article. Chardish 03:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Taco Bell. They may be delicious (so sue me, I love Taco Bell...) but they're not notable enough for their own article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Too much information here to merge into the Taco Bell article, and appears sufficient to justify own article. --DAJF 04:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It isn't important, it isn't notable, and IMO, it isn't good. - Rjd0060 04:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It's good to go...off of Wikipedia! - Chardish 05:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see how this is "sufficient to justify [its] own article" when it's a stub. Some of the information would probably be useful in the Taco Bell article, but not enough for its own. Scudmissile 05:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This reeks of WP:ADVERT. Not that a fast food item can't be notable, but this ain't no Big Mac. Hell, it isn't even a Whopper. faithless (^speak) 09:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion was added to the list of deletion proposals at WikiProject Food and drink on 3 December. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect→Taco Bell—I do think this is not sufficiently notable to merit its own article. To the comment that this is too much to merge into Taco Bell, the solution would be to create a article entitled Taco Bell Products (or similar) as a split from the main article. The potential for such a split is why I think 'redirect' is better than 'delete'; 'delete' would make the content inaccessible to most editors and would discourage development of such a split. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.