Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crumplezone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Crumplezone[edit]
- Crumplezone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is not notable enough to warrant it's own article NotARealWord (talk) 13:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - A reoccuring anime villian. Mathewignash (talk) 23:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lack of independent third person sources. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Is it appropriate to be talking about deleting this article when it's currently being suggested it merge with another article. Shouldn't that be settled first, so we know if there even IS an article to consider for deletion? Mathewignash (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think if anybody wants to, they can vote "merge" on an AfD. NotARealWord (talk) 08:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unless it is merged. Feel free to merge the content if you think it's necessary, but this article cites no reliable sources, and I am seeing no evidence that this character has any real-world notability. J Milburn (talk) 23:09, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence exists to WP:verify notability in the real world. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.