Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruise1st

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cruise1st[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bog-standard travel agency/cruise seller. No real sources other standard business notices and warmed-over press releases. Calton | Talk 02:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete quick check of Google, not much on this - no independent references - doesn't seem notable.Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:34, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a relatively small travel agency advertising their wares, refs and google not showing notability. Szzuk (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.