Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croydon Fiveways

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 09:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Croydon Fiveways[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet general notability guidelines; strictly of local interest. Miniapolis (talk) 22:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Lack of independent references in article; no evidence of notability yet. A more thorough search may find some articles (regional press coverage, maybe even architectural/town-planning refs). --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources from Google searches, either for "Croydon Fiveways" or for "Fiveways Retail Park". Qwfp (talk) 20:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Very little coverage in Gbooks or GNews. Also, there is very little information that is suitable for an encyclopaedia here even if notability was found. Two sections are about nearby transport links and one section is a detailed list of retail units. However, it may be appropriate to mention the retail park in the Croydon article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 00:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; would you merge as much information as you think appropriate into the Croydon article? I'm busy with backlog-reduction work at the moment. Miniapolis (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.