Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowns of power

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as recreation of deleted content. Also, could not find any notice of this particular game at MMO journalism sites like massively.com. Perhaps it can be recreated with independent sources after its formal debut. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crowns of power[edit]

I can see this becoming a contested PROD, so pulling into AfD for consensus. The company seems to fail WP:CORP; only 600 or so ghits for "Rampid Interactive" "Crowns of power". §FreeRangeFrog 01:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article seems like one big advertisement for the game. It cites no secondary sources; the only one that's not the official website is a blog. And it doesn't really assert its notability in any way. Maybe this article can be recreated once the game receives coverage at E3. As a side note, the article is written by Rampid (talk · contribs), which is almost certainly a WP:COI. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently he's the "General Manager" [1] of the company, yay. §FreeRangeFrog 04:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Article was deleted in 2007 along with a bunch of others created by the company, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outwar (2nd nomination). §FreeRangeFrog 04:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (G4) as recreation of deleted material. Nothing seemingly to have changed since the last AFD on this over a year ago. Oh, yeah, the horror. MuZemike 07:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.