Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowne Plaza Liverpool John Lennon Airport Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (WP:SNOW). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crowne Plaza Liverpool John Lennon Airport Hotel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notibility Monopoly31121993 (talk) 16:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No rationale presented by the nominator. Notibility? What do you mean? Could you be a bit more vague? The article states it is a Grade II listed building, so that should pass some notability threshold. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I just searched for the English Heritage listing and in fact it's Grade II*, not Grade II, which is quite a big difference as 92% of the 374,000 list entries are Grade II. Have corrected article and added listing as ref. Qwfp (talk) 09:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Reliable source coverage easily pushes it over the notability threshold. Philg88 ^♦talk 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but consider renaming. The building as an airport terminal is unquestionably notable, e.g. there's detailed discussion in Bob Hawkins, Gabriele Lechner, Paul Smith, Historic airports: proceedings of the international l'Europe de l'air Conferences on Aviation Architecture: Liverpool (1999), Berlin (2000), Paris (2001). English Heritage, 2005. Also Google books shows a lot of briefer coverage, in publications like Civil Engineering, American Aviation Historical Society Journal, and books on Liverpool history and architecture. It may also be an idea to rename the article to the terminal name which is more notable than the hotel name. A merge to Liverpool John Lennon Airport would be possible but it makes more sense to have information on the older airport in a separate article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Grade II* listing alone makes it notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. That said, the article really needs more reliable sources which are secondary.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Grade II* listed building and former airport terminal building is plenty to establish notability. The Whispering Wind (talk) 20:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball Keep. Obvious keep. Looks like snowball to me so happy for an early close. Szzuk (talk) 15:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.