Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crown Pop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Pop[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be an attempted WP:PROMOTION for a group that has not yet received any significant coverage in reliable sources. All I can find, even in Japanese articles via Google Translate, are routine promotional announcements of the group's existence that are typical for J-Pop. Also note that the article makes no attempt to assert any sort of notability for the group, except for an unconfirmed chart placement. I am familiar with some of the groups listed as "Associated acts" in the infobox but cannot figure out how they are connected to this group, except perhaps through shared management companies, which is another promotional gimmick in that genre. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:05, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Full of Advertisement with lack of reliable sources.Azkord (talk) 17:21, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems like an advertisement; due to no reliable sources and a lot of unsourced information. also has a Spotify link, making this even more likely. Slurmboy (talk) 03:25, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is too promotional in tone and format.TH1980 (talk) 03:50, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom's rationale. Simply a promotional ad for the group. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.