Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossrealms series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Missvain (talk) 23:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crossrealms series[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable topic already rejected as a draft, fails WP:BOOKCRIT Theroadislong (talk) 20:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 20:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no coverage to be found. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete possibly G11. Looks to be self-published, and I can't find any coverage of the series, reliable or not. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Before endorsing the original PROD, I did a Google search and looked through a few pages of results. I did not find any significant coverage. Username 6892 20:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - classic misuse of Wikipedia for promotion. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 21:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G11, possibly A7. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can merely prove that it exists, can't find anything suggesting notability; seems to be created for the sake of promoting the subject Spiderone 21:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.