Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossharbour (2011)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 19:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crossharbour (2011)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, unreleased independent short film - no claims of notability, no significant coverage from independent sources - fails WP:NFILMS. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Maybe it has a release at a film festival, but until then, this article (which is mostly plot content) can wait per WP:TOOSOON. Also, it's 7 minutes long? They are really stretching the definition of "short film" these days... I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 18:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Prod was contested by an SPA account. This unreleased short makes no claims of notability, and I am unable to find any significant coverage to satisfy WP:FILMS or even WP:GNG. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 19:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice per WP:TOOSOON. This short film may achieve notability once it is screened at the Albuquerque Film Festival, or not. But as it stands, it does not yet meet WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 16:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability whatsoever. -- Whpq (talk) 16:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.