Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crookes Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crookes Magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage, at least as far as Google can tell, to meet WP:GNG, fails notability. Largoplazo (talk) 18:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The links I looked at on Google didn't show any secondary sources. It was started in 2015, so apparently it has not attracted the attention of the world yet. Unscintillating (talk) 23:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 19:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.