Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critique (journal)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 01:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Critique (journal)[edit]

Critique (journal) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student journal indexed pretty much nowhere (it's in EBSCO, that's about it). Fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Tagged for notability since 2011 without anything showing notability coming forward. Merging info on a minor publication to the article on the university seems undue to me. --Randykitty (talk) 07:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree here. Normally I'm all for merging to the publisher, but this is very very minor. It's a publication for students in one department. Merging to the department (or faculty/school) would be appropriate, but that department isn't notable to begin with. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.