Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticisms of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas[edit]

The article is biased and objective and for the most part, unfounded, considering the amount of praise for Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. It is not cited and is written in the tone of an upset player. Furthermore, it is more relevant to a game guide or review, not an encyclopedia article. Y2kcrazyjoker4 05:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Ckessler 05:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seems like OR to me. The only really notable criticism was over hot coffee, and that's discussed in the main article. Croctotheface 05:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 05:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone wants to a)cite these criticisms and/or b)write about the actually notable criticisms: the Hot Coffee mod crap. Koweja 05:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Source or die ~ trialsanderrors 05:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Completely unsourced. MER-C 05:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Source that thing or TO THE DEATH CHAMBER! Reeks of OR, plus it just plain sucks and is unencyclopedic. Pwnzorize it! E. Sn0 =31337= ^Talk 06:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but not for the lack of sources. Any PC gaming magazine would be an adequate source for nearly all the statements made here. However, we're not a review site, so the "criticisms" have to be the notable ones, i.e. Hot Coffee, which is already in the main article. yandman 08:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Weaselicious, baby. Grand master ka 08:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely unsourced POV. Not even worth a smerge to the GTA:SA article. -- Kicking222 14:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Since when is Wikipedia a website to get advice on whether they should buy a video came or not? --Adam Riley ^Talk 19:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think it's not. E. Sn0 =31337= ^Talk
Delete, per above. Comment: When I saw the title I expected some sort of morality debate over the game play and content, such an article might have some intrinsic value (if painstakingly crafted), but this does suck. --MegaBurn 00:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP is not GameRankings, WP is not a fansite/forum substitute. Create Criticisms of Jet Set Willy instead. QuagmireDog 15:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DeletePjbflynn 04:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.