Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina Nardozzi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. It may be prudent to await a community consensus at the beauty pageant RFC before nominating again. A Train^talk 10:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cristina Nardozzi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nardozzi was a non-notable state winner of a Miss USA related contest. Nothing about her is notable. She may have been cast in a minor role of a cocktail waitress is a film that was released 9 years ago. The article on the film makes no mention of her, but that might just be a result of the role being too small to mention. Nardozzi is just not notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Massachusetts USA as a valid search term, and where the subject is listed at. Sources in the article are local, and additional searches are not providing much else. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We appear to have articles on multiple other Miss USA contestants from the year Nardozzi participated in. Plus, per WP:ANYBIO she "received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times". Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- WP:ANYBIO does not really apply as this honour is not significant and well know, as per available source. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a weak one, since there are a few mentions here, not much in-depth.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I support deletion rather than redirection. She isn't notable, so delete or redirect, and I see redirecting as a statement that her greatest accomplishment in life is likely to remain winning a beauty pageant aged 21. I find that rather demeaning. Blythwood (talk) 22:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BIO1E; the subject is otherwise not notable. WP:ANYBIO does not apply since this pageant is not "well-known and significant". I also agree with Blythwood that a redirect is somewhat demeaning. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:38, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of sourcing. I don't assume her accomplishments couldn't be notable, but they simply have not been noted: all I could find were those East Bay articles, which only count as one source, and this passing mention in the NY Daily News, not even close to enough to develop a reliable, balanced biography of a living person. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now, pending outcome of SNG pageant RfC. Aoziwe (talk) 12:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not seeing significant coverage, as Innisfree987 notes. Redirect probably not called for per Blythwood. Neutrality^talk 22:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.