Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cricketers Who Have Taken 10 Wickets And A Century In A Test Match

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to List of Test cricket records. (non-admin closure) czar ⨹ 19:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cricketers Who Have Taken 10 Wickets And A Century In A Test Match[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Three entries doesn't qualify for a stand alone list. NG39 (Used to be NickGibson3900)^Talk 10:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. PinchHittingLeggy (talk) 23:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with List of Test cricket records. I agree that 3 items is a little short of the number required for such a list. But the information is of interest to cricket fans and deserves a place. I'm happy to do that. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 21:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with List of Test cricket records; the list is too short and arguably too obscure to stand alone, but it does seem like it could be of interest to cricket fans. It does, after all, describe a pretty impressive combination of events. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:03, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per both Perry and Luke above. List of Test cricket records conspicuously lacks an all-round section in its individual records section so this table should start one and another table should be created for all-round career totals. Jack | ^{talk page} 20:41, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pile-on Merge !vote. It's a pretty staggering feat is 10 wickets and a century; hence the very short list of people who've done it. I wouldn't expect vast numbers of players to be added to it even in the next hundred years, so it's not really suitable for a separate list; fits nicely in the records article though. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 02:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.