Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crichton Leprechaun (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, sources have been added to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Crichton Leprechaun[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Crichton Leprechaun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not appear to meet the notability guideline for WP:WEB. Unsourced since creation, with the exception (if you can call it a published source) of embedded external links to YouTube and sites dedicated to the Mobile Leprechaun that were prompted by the YouTube video. Altairisfartalk 09:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of Internet phenomena. This is not notable or particularly significant on its own, really, but it would make a great addition as an (unlinked) entry there. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 09:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete*Keep See Dravecky's post. Drunken Pirate (talk) 20:15, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable. Everyking (talk) 07:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep and I'd ask any editor to review the article as it stands now since I have cleaned it up, expanded it, and added several reliable third-party sources in the last hour or so. This phenomenon (both the apparition and the aftermath) received coverage in regional media plus The New York Times, the Sunday Mirror, the International Herald-Tribune and other reliable sources that strongly prove notability and other sources speak to verifiability as well. - Dravecky (talk) 07:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.