Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credit rating transition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Credit rating transition[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article that has no significant coverage in reliable sources (therefore failing the WP:GNG) and should be deleted. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 21:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't say anything that's not already in credit rating. Not a concept independent of credit ratings: ratings change, there's no reason for them to be fixed. Maybe there's something interesting that can be said about ratings going up or down, but this article doesn't contribute anything, and any additional information could be included in the article on credit ratings rather than fragmenting it unnecessarily. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.