Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credit Union Central of Manitoba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Credit Union Central of Manitoba

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Credit Union Central of Manitoba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As written, this fails WP:NORG, WP:Notability, and WP:Permastub, and following the lead of User:Piotrus and User:Mrschimpf, this article may not be notable or, if it is, it is either a permastub or an emerging permastub. This is arguably an example of WP:CORPSPAM and I would also point out Wikipedia is not a directory or the yellow pages. Unless someone, or some people, want to do some research and write an organizational history from a neutral point of view, it should be deleted. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. The worst of the bunch of recently nominated Canadian bank stubs so far, this one has next to no references. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.