Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creature (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creature (company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

run of the mill defunct company that doesn't pass GNG. Graywalls (talk) 09:14, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, and Washington. Graywalls (talk) 09:14, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've been on a long hiatus from Wikipedia so I may be wrong but wouldn't this likely qualify as a speedy deletion A7? There are really no attempts to explain why the company is notable in any way and the article is incredibly short. Assuming for some reason it doesn't, it's a clear delete per the above for me. Darron4 (talk) 10:13, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The sources in the article are poor, but this article is a bit more substantial for considering whether there is any notability. AllyD (talk) 13:32, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That article does not even have a date. I remain neutral on the assessment on meeting secondary source or if it's something akin to WP:FORBESCON article. Advertisement agency in an obscure advertisement/communications related publication also limits the span of WP:AUD. Also, if it opened in 2002 and closed in 2016 and it's no longer talked about, it's an indication that it doesn't pass WP:20YT as articles are expected to have enduring notability. notability also requires verifiable evidence. I haven't seen it yet.. Graywalls (talk) 06:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.