Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative Beading

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence of notability via WP:GNG. joe decker ^{talk to me} 19:16, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Beading[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. A non-notable magazine published by a non-notable company ~~in a non-notable country~~. oops.... -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:30, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found no notability. SL93 (talk) 00:41, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~ Per nom + No references; no notability; no place on Wikipedia, at this stage. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 05:21, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.