Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative Barcode (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Barcode[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived company that was a 2011 no consensus during its period of operation. Sourcing then was mostly non-independent and definitely not in depth, and never improved before the company ceased operation in 2019. I do not find any evidence it passes WP:ORG Star Mississippi 20:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping for Prior AfD participants who remain active: @Theroadislong and Andy Dingley: Star Mississippi 20:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 11:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, didn't generate enough coverage towards any real notability while it was around. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.