The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Titoxd(?!?) 00:43, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Looks to be a nonsense/vanity page that's been up for 5 months. Google gives nothing notable for the name Creasman. JJay 15:53, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --JJay 15:53, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Vanity. mdd4696 21:11, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
