Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - no reliable sources to indicate that this individual episode is independently notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PLOT. Episode is already covered in sufficient detail in the season 1 article and the title is an extremely unlikely search string; no need for merger or redirect. Otto4711 (talk) 16:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - somehow Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Hungarian sentiment (2nd nomination) has been subsumed into this nomination and I can't see how to fix it. Otto4711 (talk) 16:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Yes, I see, but I dont understand how to correct it. --maxval (talk) 16:49, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed now, cheers Ottawa4ever (talk) 17:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge intact into a combination article. (and complete the description of the episode--it does not actually say how it ends, and we don't use teasers. . DGG ( talk ) 04:39, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you care to grace us with an actual rationale? Tarc (talk) 12:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Zero real-world notability of this particular episode. Other episodes of the season should be evaluated as well, and folded into a single season article if necessary. Tarc (talk) 12:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.