Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig J. N. de Paulo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Craig J. N. de Paulo[edit]

Craig J. N. de Paulo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been marked as deficient since 2013 without substantial revisions. AMDG4 (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable religious leader.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable Bishop of the very small "Old Catholic" faction/denomination. Note that the theological college of which he is or was head has been deleted for lack of notability: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collegium Augustinianum.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as per above comment non-notable religious leader. Reddragon7 (talk) 04:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete He has not been mentioned in a reliable source. ―Susmuffin Talk 11:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- If the article's content is correct, he ought to be notable. However I note that his appointment was from west Africa, which does not bode well. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.