Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crackers the Corporate Crime Fighting Chicken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crackers the Corporate Crime Fighting Chicken[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable character that appeared in 2 Michael Moore projects. Any reliable coverage, if it exists, is in passing or in relation to TV Nation or The Awful Truth. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Below are some sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Schultz, E. (2005). Michael Moore: A Biography. No Series Information Required Series. ECW Press. pp. 87-90. ISBN 978-1-55022-699-7.
Jones, J.P. (2010). Entertaining Politics: Satiric Television and Political Engagement. Communication, Media, and Politics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 147–. ISBN 978-0-7425-6529-6. – At least two paragraphs. It's clear that the subject continues on the next page, but I cannot access it.
Silverman, D.S. (2007). You Can't Air That: Four Cases of Controversy and Censorship in American Television Programming. Television and Popular Culture. Syracuse University Press. p. 126. ISBN 978-0-8156-3150-7. – At least two paragraphs. It's clear that the subject continues on the next page, but I cannot access it.
McEnteer, J. (2006). Shooting the Truth: The Rise of American Political Documentaries. Praeger Publishers. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-275-98760-2. – Two paragraphs
Ericson, Edward Jr. (December 23, 1998). "A Disney rap sheet thatâ??s for the birds". Orlando Weekly. – Six paragraphs, although a couple are shorter paragraphs.

Keep. While I expected to vote delete at first, sources presented above suggest notability. I can't access all of them, but I read the 3-4 pages in Schultz and that's seems to meet SIGCOV. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, in accordance with NA's sources. I also went through some of the google books results, and they discuss this character in more than passing.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:27, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per reasoning provided by other editors who precede me. Haleth (talk) 12:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.