Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crack Music (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Late Registration. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:11, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crack Music[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Substantially expanded from the stub version that was AfD'd to redirect way back, but to my mind only by drawing together a vast array of trivia, dribs and drabs. I don't see anything in the cited sources to establish notability independent of the album, but music editors please assess. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:16, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 12:36, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 12:41, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article has so much information within it that considering it for deletion is ridiculous and I even listed alternative versions... Kyle Peake (talk) 16:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect tp Late Registration. The song has gotten a little independent notice for topics in the lyrics, but most supporting sources are about the album overall. Stuff about this song can be added to the "Lyrics and themes" section at the album article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given split opinions. A reminder to editors to provide justifications for their !votes
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: (As above)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect - 12 years on and there's still no evidence of notability to warrant a seperate article so pretty much as per the last AFD this should be merged and redirected back. –Davey2010^Talk 15:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect sufficiently covered at the target article. wumbolo ^^^ 17:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.