Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crabman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Crabman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional monster. One mention in a "Most underrated monsters" list is not enough to establish notability. Not a very active user (talk) 07:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 07:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 07:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The topic does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 12:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non-notable creature. The one non-primary source is extremely brief, as the coverage consists of a few jokey sentences. Rorshacma (talk) 00:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.