Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrElyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, WP:SNOW, unpublished or selfpublished work, no references. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CrElyan[edit]

Hoax. Google search returns no relevant hits or reliable sources. Fails WP:V. Farix (Talk) 13:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Farix (Talk) 13:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:NFT. Also not manga. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um. It started serialization less than two weeks ago in a "now-defunct shōnen"? Leaving aside whether inside a boy is really meant or that's an adjective with a missing noun, the dates don't add up. It has every hallmark, however, of not being a hoax but rather a self-published work. I'm finding zip, nada, and zilch on searches for it, by a variety of search terms, so even if it is real, it's so non-notable it doesn't belong here. Delete for failing WP:BOOK and WP:V. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, either a hoax or doujinshi (which certainly wouldn't be notable), created by a single purpose account (so far at least). Possibly WP:COI if it is a doujinshi - the talk page has been tagged as if it is a possible COI. Dandy Sephy (talk) 15:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hoax or Doujin, probably the former. Yea something like "now-defunct shōnen" is extremely suspicious. More funnier is the article mentioning that the series started as a light novel serialization on June 5, 2009 and at the same time its manga adaptation serialization started the very same day. I can't believe that an original work & its adaptation started serialization the same day. --KrebMarkt 16:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.