Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covariance operator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. given references that have been added. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Covariance operator[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unref article, and I couldn't find sources to show it meets WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It needs work, but there's a solid mathematical topic here that can be written about using sources. XOR'easter (talk) 18:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Besides the sources that have been added to the article, I am seeing additional reliable sources in a Google search. So this seems to be a valid, notable topic. Rlendog (talk) 15:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.