Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cousin White Paper: Aching Mature Lewdness (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cousin White Paper: Aching Mature Lewdness[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo entry on an unremarkable movie; does not meet WP:NFILM. The awards listed -- "8th Best Film" -- is not significant. No encyclopedically relevant prose.

The article went through an AfD process in 2010 (with a no consensus result) but is not better for it. It's still strictly a WP:CATALOG entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:37, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:37, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:37, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As I wrote in the initial AFD, fails WP:NOTFILM, and has no coverage shown in reliable independent sources. The Pink Grand Prix is a readers' poll conducted by "PG" (perhaps "P*G") magazine, a publication of no established notability. According to this news article [1], cited as a reliable source in the article on the award itself, "PG" is a "fanzine," or fan magazine. Reader polls, whether for print or online publications, generally aren't seen as establishing notability unless the publication is clearly notable (if then), and when they are, only the first place finisher is generally seen as having its own notability established by the poll. The film's article is sourced only to a comprehensive listing of produced films, which establishes only existence but not notability, and to the fanzine's own website, which lacks the independence required to establish notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree that it does not appear to meet WP:NFILM. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable film, Fails FILM & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 04:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFILM.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 07:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.