Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Road 511 (Brevard County, Florida)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of county roads in Brevard County, Florida. Fails WP:USRD/NT. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

County Road 511 (Brevard County, Florida)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable as a stand alone article. Suggest merger/redirection into List of county roads in Brevard County, Florida. Imzadi 1979 → 01:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - Per nom. Dough 48 72 01:56, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has value & potential for expansion. FieldMarine (talk) 02:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is John Rodes Boulevard, admittedly a narrow road but to an important industrial and densely populated area. Would be desirable to have this separate to link in. While this can be done as part of another article, subtitles tend to change. Student7 (talk) 02:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per USRD's notability guidelines and nom. --Admrboltz (talk) 03:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. Completely unsourced article. Wikipedia should not be a street map in prose. In fact, I wouldn't see much benefit in a street map written in prose outside of Wikipedia, either. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. – T M F 05:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom and WP:USRD/NT. --Rs chen 7754 23:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was more willing to vote to Redirect, than the other two because it's better than total elimination. But the plaque in the article shows it has some history to it, which gives it hope for expansion, as well as the fact that it serves as the terminus of another more important than usual county road. The article as it stands, however, isn't enough. Find more sources and links for this one too. ----DanTD (talk) 12:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. I fully endorse the nominator's rationale. –Fredddie ™ 00:16, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.