Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Tonite Theatre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Country Tonite Theatre[edit]

Most of article is list of awards copied directly from the CTT website, many of which don't identify the awarding organization. Many of the others don't have WP articles. NACMAI hosts on GeoCities, which doesn't tend to point toward notability. Aside from list of awards, does not assert notability particularly well. Delete SarekOfVulcan 04:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The awards list seems to be a copy of the list on the organization's website, at [1], from an anon edit in February. Appears to have been an attempt to demonstrate notability and get rid of a spam header. Willing to reconsider, but as it is there are zero secondary sources per WP:CORP, and I will be very pleasantly surprised if any appear. LaughingVulcan 05:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: Seems to have been put up primarily as a vehicle to push Brianna Rieffel, who is up for AfD herself. A search through Google turns up nothing but promotional, marketing and advertising links [2]. That being said, there are 559 unique hits, which is quite a lot. If any reliable sourcing turns up, my vote would likely change. Ravenswing 13:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- As would mine: it was primarily my lack of ability to find good references which led me to nominate it.--SarekOfVulcan 15:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn, I'd love to know who awarded them those awards, but we haven't been told, have we? Totally agree with Ravenswing on the suspicious creation of this article. Corvus cornix 19:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Same here, i agree with Ravenswing even though he bit me on my RfA and almost made me quit.JONJONBT^{Talk to me!} 19:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Reply: Well, but see, now you're starting to do some of the things which would have made your RfA more viable, none of which you had before done. That's a good thing; keep it up. Ravenswing 20:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless sources are provided. While the list of awards certainly saved it when I nominated it for a speedy deletion, something with so much prestigious must have been written about in reliable sources. --Daniel J. Leivick 19:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced article posted by a disruptive editor who has shown little regard for Wikipedia policies and guidelines (and has since been blocked). DarkAudit 20:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The main contributor of the article has been indef blocked, it is unlikely he will either comment here or source the article. -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - but that doesn't mean that someone else can't come up with some...--SarekOfVulcan 12:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.