Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counselor of Tragedy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G3 — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Counselor of Tragedy[edit]

Counselor of Tragedy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DePRODed by creator without addressing the issue(s). Concern was: Regretfully, it appears that this article might not pass Wikipedia's general notability guidelines without any reliable secondary sources to back it up. I'd also take a look at WP:CRYSTAL to learn why this article might not be able to be on Wikipedia yet. Thank you!. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG. There were no sources to be found during my search for them. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as probable hoax. I can't find anything to actually back up that this show really exists. The only source on the article comes up with a blank page and the search hits for Google in the Hangul bring up nothing that I could find. Considering that this is supposed to have 50 episodes already filmed, you'd think that there would be some sort of hit that would show up on Google. Even if it hasn't shown yet, filming that amount of episodes would get some sort of notice. I'm tagging it as a hoax, but in the slim chance that it isn't a hoax, it does appear to be non-notable. I know that not having a page on another Wikipedia isn't always a sign of something being a hoax, but I note that there is no equivalent page on the Korean Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.