Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Costas Markou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 03:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Costas Markou[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This player doesn't turn to professional yet, second division and below is not recognized by Fifa (Argento1985) 01:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - According to Soccerway, he has 42 appearances in the fully professional Cypriot First Division, meaning the article passes WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Sir Sputnik, meets WP:NFOOTBALL - needs improving, not deleting. Also entirely unsure what nominator's comment of "second division and below is not recognized by Fifa" means, factually incorrect statement. Giant Snowman 14:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Needs improving, not deleting. Walls of Jericho (talk) 18:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - we presume a player is notable when he has played in a fully pro league as he passes WP:NFOOTY. Though this article needs improvement. Mentoz86 (talk) 03:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.