Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cory Lingner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Lingner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this performer is up to the level of notability called for under WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. There is a little bit of focused coverage in possibly suitable sources, such as [1], but that's a hometown local weekly), and [2], but that article "originally appeared in" the same hometown weekly. What coverage there is, is in connection with a single off-Broadway role for which he was nominated for, but didn't win, one award (though that's the main reason why I didn't submit for speedy deletion under A7); and, more recently, he's Ensemble and understudy. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Largoplazo (talk) 17:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 21:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 21:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 21:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most significant coverage is hometown coverage of his parents. Credits are all of "ensemble" or "understudy" level. Remaining sources are to bare database listings or not really about this performer. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 18:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Since the two articles linked by Largoplazo are by the same author and from the same publication, they count as one source under the GNG. I couldn't find any other articles to count as a good second source. There are two articles from TheaterMania, which is probably a reliable source, but they are so short and contain so little info on Lingner that I think they fall just short of the GNG level of significant coverage. And he fails WP:ENT since his Broadway roles have all been ensemble or understudy. --Cerebellum (talk) 22:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.