Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cory Heath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have ignored the !votes from apparent SPA's. Courcelles 02:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Heath[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - Non Notable person, the article was speedy deleted once before however for reasons unknown was declined this time. ZooPro 23:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable model. Carrite (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only independent source I can locate is the write-up in his hometown newspaper. Not enough here to satisfy WP:BIO. Deor (talk) 13:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Notable model/actor. I found a source w/ a resume at http://www.sag.org/iactor/CoryHeath Abc121212 (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC) — Abc121212 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Weak Keep - the write-up in his hometown paper, plus the other sources, make him barely notable. Bearian (talk) 22:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- I say keep it. Seems legit and notable to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.247.167.26 (talk) 11:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that IP 76.247.167.26 is infact user Abc121212, furthermore indicating that the article is not notable if its creater has to "puff" up the AfD with "keeps". ZooPro 11:48, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- after reviewing the sources as compared to other notable people in this similar area, I have reason to believe this subject is notable.Raymond44 (talk) 20:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC) — Raymond44 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete. He fails WP:ENTERTAINER and RS coverage is insufficient for WP:GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a single "local boy does good" profile piece in the local paper does not establish notability. When considering notability, the nature and type of coverage needs to be considered. -- Whpq (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.