Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornovil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was: Withdrawn and no delete votes. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 06:19, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Cornovil

I don't feel qualified enough to list this for speedy deletion, but its Google results aren't promising. Non-notable term, or not English? Booyabazooka 03:26, 14 May 2006 (UTC) Deletion proposal withdrawn, redirecting to proper spelling. ~ Booyabazooka 06:05, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

• No vote yet. Google is not everything. Got independent confirmation from the first non-WP hit. User also created one-line articles for the following tribes: Dubunni, Venicones, Carvetti, Taexall, Caledones. Suggest merge all into one article if verified. Would appreciate if someone with knowledge commented on veracity.- CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep everything and merge into one article per [1]. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 05:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Besides, in this case, we already have an article: Cornovii - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 05:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Ok, never mind, per List of Celtic tribes, all but Taexall have articles. These are all misspelled. Redirect them all except Taexall, which keep and and rename. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 05:58, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.