Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Marr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corey Marr[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a film producer, not making or reliably sourcing any serious claim to passing WP:CREATIVE. The only notability claim on offer here is that films he has worked on exist -- the subject also repeatedly self-edits the article to add the advertorialized phrase "His passion for telling great stories has enabled him to work with some of the world’s leading brands and create award-winning content that has been seen all over the world", which isn't a notability claim either and violates our neutral point of view and conflict of interest rules. As always, simply existing is not automatic grounds for a Wikipedia article per se -- he needs to be the subject of a significant volume and depth of reliable source coverage about him, but that hasn't been shown here, and Wikipedia is not a platform for our article subjects to write about or promote themselves advertorially.
Also see our WP:AUTOBIO rules, as yes, the subject did start the article himself. Bearcat (talk) 15:05, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:05, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:05, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:35, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Indeed a autobio article. Good to see the promotional phrases are removed by nom. The subject of the article also started the article about the film Passenger Side, only where he was an exclusive producer. Producing four movies over two decades that too only being credited as primary or sole producer in a single movie is not making any producer notable. Also, per nom, we lack sinificant coverage here. Chirota (talk) 02:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lacks SIGCOV.-KH-1 (talk) 04:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Certainly lack of [WP:SIGCOV|, Myconcern (talk) 17:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.