Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corepoint Health

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Corepoint Health[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a single-purpose account, nearly no external references, notability dubious. Srittau (talk) 16:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all better including for WP:CORP and WP:GNG. SwisterTwister talk 21:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - corp article of unclear notability. The only independent ref is the fortherecordmag.com ref, on its own insufficient to establish notability. This ref also reads like regurgitated PR. The others are all incidental mentions, non-RS sites, or pieces by corepoint employees. A search turned up press releases and incidental mentions, but no significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 16:51, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.