Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cordoba Academy for Classical Islamic Sciences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cordoba Academy for Classical Islamic Sciences[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable online school - references do not support claims of notability, no significant Ghits either. Fails WP:GNG. ukexpat (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ORG. could not find any reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 08:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing the coverage. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.