Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cor Fijneman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cor Fijneman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article contains original research and the references do not indicate significant third-party notability, which is not enough to pass WP:MUSIC. Hakken (talk) 21:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Lacks significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. I created this article when I was a novice WP editor. My perception now is that we should not create articles on topics that don't have a chance at ever being a comprehensive article with various elements to discuss. Dawnseeker2000 03:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 21:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 21:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even if the above editor hadn't expressed agreement, this would be an easy delete call due to unavailability of good sourcing. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dawnseeker. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.