Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copia Doble Systema

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copia Doble Systema[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:MUSICBIO or GNG czar · · 15:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:38, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 20:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as far as I can tell they don't pass WP:BAND (yet). Yintan 20:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Some EPs and some mentions at specialist sites. Might be at this point more helpful to have an article about their genre Digital Cumbia or "nu-cumbia. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:06, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.