Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cop math

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cop math[edit]

Contested (kinda) prod. Intended to disparage the police and completely unencyclopedic in nature. I was tempted to speedy it, it seems like it'd fit as an attack page (would it?) --JStalk 05:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not that I've anything against disparaging or attacking cops. --Aim Here 08:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, specifically because it's original research. ~ Lav-chan 09:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. BTLizard 10:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's disparagement, but it's not an attack page directed at an individual. Yes, there is a vague notion of "cop math" in the world. People have employed it here and here, for examples. But a few people writing disparaging discussion forum posts does not provide a foundation for an encyclopaedia article. And this current article is a first-person expression of a single person's opinion, and clearly original research. Delete. Uncle G 13:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced, single point of view, and feels very Americocentric. Espresso Addict 16:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete At best, it's a neologism and original research. I'd suggest speedy, but it's arguable whether the sole purpose of this page is to disparage its subject. eaolson 22:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—Material is not encyclopedic; fails Wikipedia:Verifiability; appears to violate Wikipedia:No original research. Williamborg (Bill) 00:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Should be a brief note in black market price, street value, or value of illegal goods or something; note none of those exist yet, so the article's creators have something on their todo list :-) RandomP 13:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, for the reasons expressed above. 82.55.199.200 14:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.