Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooke Manuscript

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transwikid, keep the thorough rewrite. Babajobu 04:20, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Cooke Manuscript

Obviously a directly copied speech should be deleted transwikied! But is this notable/related to something notable? Grandmasterka 10:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Grandmasterka, This is an ancient text written in 1450, this version an 1890 transcription of an 1847 translation, & yes, it is referenced by the History of Freemasonry article, which is referenced by the Freemasonry, Knights Templar, & List of spirituality-related topics articles. Grye 10:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

• Transwiki to wikisource. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-02-06 10:38Z
• Transwiki to wikisource. Original material belongs there, not on wikipedia. ::Supergolden:: 10:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wikisource. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 10:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki source material should be at wikisource, not deleted. Mgm|^(talk) 10:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Agreed: Transwiki I'll work on it, but it'll take a while, I'm unfamiliar with Wikisource & it's late here in CO. Grye 10:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• tw I am going to attempt the transwiki now (my first) Avi 19:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Transwikied here: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Matthew_Cooke_Manuscript

Took data about Cooke manuscript and created proto-article. Change vote to Keep

• Keep Avi's rewrite. u p p l a n d 00:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.