Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conversant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:37, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conversant[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is questionable, and the article reads like an advert. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: The company has been known as "Conversant" only for a small part of its independent existence and now as a subsidiary of Alliance Data, so it is worth also considering the former name, added above. AllyD (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This gets to the ever-present problem of what Wikipedia wants to be, an encyclopedia or a catchall business directory. Is this business unique? It is especially profitable or known to legions of people? Since the answer to both questions is "no," this article should go. Chisme (talk) 21:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.