Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Control-left

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:SNOW. I JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 00:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Control-left[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems like a neologism, but I found a few uses of the term [1] [2] in sources. menaechmi (talk) 20:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – non-notable neologism, used primarily in blogs. –barakokula31 (talk) 20:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no indication that the phrase has achieved either mainstream usage or attention from multiple independent reliable sources. Not A10 but definitely just a blog-esque term. DrStrauss talk 20:43, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The new neologism-of-the-moment, found in fringe blogs like Powerline, thedeepstate.com and Lew Rockwell. Not at all suitable or notable for the Wikipedia. TheValeyard (talk) 21:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Textbook WP:NEOlogism. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is not urban dictionary. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I could not find any use of this term outside blogs or minor media sources; as such fails WP:GNG --Hazarasp (talk) 04:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No coverage outside of fringe political blogs. Zero in-depth coverage to satisfy notability requirements. AusLondonder (talk) 14:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable and mostly invented. Volunteer Marek 23:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no coverage in reliable sources. Cjhard (talk) 00:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.