Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contrary Warrior

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete the article. Mailer Diablo 15:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary Warrior[edit]

Doesn't seem encyclopedia material to me. Second half of the article is a copyvio. Also, doesn't appear to be Wiktionary worthy (not a dicdef), but I'm leaving the dicdef template there anyways. Suggest either rewrite or delete. TheProject 03:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In its current form delete, if it can be fixed up keep -- Tawker 04:08, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice to recreation in better form. Kimchi.sg 12:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete as copyvio per nom. -- ReyBrujo 17:36, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - i dont c nothing unencylopedic about it. Luka Jačov 22:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep- take out the copyvio, and you've still got a stub that can be expanded. Reyk _YO! 22:53, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Arbusto 23:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as copyvio, allowing for later recreation. ~Kylu (u|t) 04:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment- I have removed the copyvio. What's left, in my opinion, could still be expanded by someone with a bit of expertise in this area. Reyk _YO! 08:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, absolutely no context (which happens to be a CSD, but I'm too lazy to tag it). --Rory096 08:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; I've trimmed the copyvio part. Stifle (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. --Tony Sidaway 12:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.