Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 23:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation[edit]

Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article that I stumbled upon via STiKi. Totally unencyclopedic and of unknown notability. Really unsalvageable in present form. Actually warrants speedy deletion but am nominating for deletion in recognition of its age and number of contributors, even though none of the contributors has apparently expended much effort into making this a Wikipedia article. Coretheapple (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

and many academic papers;

There are many more. Not to mention all the news items; [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. SpinningSpark 00:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 08:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and per WP:SNOW: certainly not a candidate for speedy deletion since no CSD criteria fit. Subject gets overwhelmingly significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, and notability to pass WP:GNG is unquestioned. Below I add just ~10 {{cite book}}s. A book search is mandatory WP:BEFORE nominating for AfD. Pinging Coretheapple for their reconsideration. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content
  • Training of Trainers in Science and Technology Education: Asian edition. Commonwealth Secretariat. 1 January 1996. pp. 52–. ISBN 978-0-85092-480-0.
  • Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation: Teachers' Handbook for Primary Stage. National Council of Educational Research and Training. 2003. ISBN 978-81-7450-246-9.
  • J. P. Singhal (1 June 2010). Academic Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in Social Science X. Laxmi Publications Pvt Limited. ISBN 978-93-80644-19-6.
  • Dr. N. K. Sharma (1 June 2010). Academic Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in Science X. Laxmi Publications Pvt Limited. ISBN 978-93-80644-18-9.
  • Poonam Banga (1 August 2010). Solutions to Academic Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in Hindi X B. Laxmi Publications Pvt Limited. ISBN 978-93-80644-27-1.
  • J. B. Dixit (1 February 2010). Comprehensive Mathematics Activities and Projects X. Laxmi Publications. pp. 4–. ISBN 978-81-318-0806-1.
  • The Indian Journal of Social Work. Vol. 59. Department of Publications, Tata Institute of Social Sciences. 1998. pp. 625–.
  • Rewa Bhasin (14 February 2014). Dynamic Memory Modern Paragraph Writing-Secondary Level. Diamond Pocket Books Pvt Ltd. pp. 22–. ISBN 978-93-5083-345-2.
  • Publisher's Monthly. Vol. 38. 1996. pp. 80–.
  • J. S. Rajput; National Council of Educational Research and Training (India) (2004). Encyclopaedia of Indian Education: A-K. NCERT. pp. 365–. ISBN 978-81-7450-303-9.
  • Journal of Indian Education. Vol. 18. National Council of Educational Research and Training. 1992. pp. 11–.
  • Comment Sure, I'm OK with withdrawing it, given that references have been supplied. Coretheapple (talk) 13:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.