Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConsumerTrack Inc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

ConsumerTrack Inc

ConsumerTrack Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear advertising as not only is the history showing clear COI advertising but everything here is naturally only targeted advertising with published and republished PR announcements, and that's exactly what searches found thus nothing to sensibly accept in our policies against advertising or against any company webhosting at all. Especially when an article goes to the lengths of sourcing each sentence and paragraph with a PR source, simply to make it seem as if it's acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 18:14, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 23:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 23:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 23:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - Purely promotional. Nothing notable about subject. Created by SPA account. As nom stated, most of references are press releases or don't mention subject at all. New searches produces nothing new. CBS527^Talk 18:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. Too promotional to keep. Any borderline notability should await a non-SPA interested in the subject. DGG ( talk ) 01:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.